Remember that cringe-worthy ad where a “diverse” group of models all had six fingers, or the product shot featuring a bizarrely distorted hand clutching an otherwise beautiful watch? Or perhaps you’ve scrolled past an eCommerce DTC site where every single product description felt like it was churned out by a robot on a caffeine overdose, full of repetitive phrases and generic platitudes.
You’d think these are just minor hiccups; but they’re glaring examples of generative AI gone wrong, particularly for direct-to-consumer (DTC) brands aiming for authenticity and connection. In the wild west of AI integration, many brands are jumping on the bandwagon without truly understanding the reins. This isn’t about AI being inherently “bad”; it’s about using it badly. No brands, big or small, are immune to this, especially in the current hype cycle.
“Prompt and Pray” in Creative Production
I’ll be blunt: slapping a few keywords into a generative AI tool like Sora or Midjourney and expecting magic is a recipe for digital disaster. For DTC brands, creative production and deployment are paramount.
Your visuals, your copy, your entire digital storefront needs to resonate with your target audience. Rushed, amateurish AI execution often leads to low-quality output that’s jarringly inconsistent and lacks the nuanced touch of human creativity.
We’re talking about uncanny valley imagery, generic copy that reads like a user manual, and visual assets that clash with your carefully crafted brand guidelines. This isn’t just about aesthetics; it directly impacts conversion rates and brand perception.
Copyright, Reusability, and the Authenticity Abyss
Beyond the visual blunders, there’s a tangled web of issues.
Copyright is a minefield. Are you truly certain the AI-generated asset doesn’t infringe on existing intellectual property?
Relying on AI for quick content also severely compromises reusability and consistency. Your brand voice needs to be cohesive across all touch points, from product pages to social media. A scattershot approach to AI content generation will lead to a fragmented brand identity that confuses customers and erodes trust.
This brings us to authenticity. DTC brands thrive on genuine connection. When your brand’s voice and visuals feel mass-produced and uninspired, you risk losing that vital human touch that differentiates you in a crowded market. Customers are savvier than ever; they can spot inauthenticity a mile away.
For larger companies, unfortunately, GenAI initiatives are often led by teams or leaders who are clueless about content, marketing, branding, or legal issues related to the output. Focusing solely on the technology, broad promises, and being “relevant” by AI-ing everything.
The True Cost of “Free” AI: Beyond the Monetary
While some generative AI tools might seem “free,” the hidden cost of misusing them can be astronomical. Think about the time spent correcting AI blunders, the potential legal fees from copyright disputes, and most importantly, the damage to your brand reputation. Investing in quality human expertise, even for AI integration, ultimately saves you money and headaches in the long run.
This brings us to the elephant in the room: prompt engineering expertise requirement. This isn’t just about casual prompting. It demands a deep understanding of various AI tools, their capabilities, and their limitations.
Most importantly, it requires design production expertise, a keen eye for detail, and design-specific prompt engineering skills to guide the AI effectively. It’s about knowing which tools to use for what, understanding how to refine outputs, and having the creative vision to interpret and elevate AI suggestions. With this, the traditional creative directors, stylists, and editors are still your bedrock for a solid content production workflow. Gen AI tools are just tools to support these core skills.
Don’t Let Your Brand Be an Gen AI Cautionary Tale
Close to home, even government institutions fall into the same problem. While the examples below may not be DTC website specific, the cautionary tales apply nonetheless.
Singapore Ministry of Finance’s AI-Generated Social Media Ad In late 2024, Singapore’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) faced significant public backlash for an AI-generated image used in a sponsored Instagram advertisement promoting rebates for lower-income families. Social media users quickly pointed out the uncanny valley effect of the family featured, with distorted hands and an overall “scam-like” appearance. Critics argued that using AI for such a sensitive topic, without human touch-ups, felt lazy and disingenuous, especially for a campaign meant to connect with real people in need. The “Visuals were created using AI tools” disclosure in the ad itself ironically drew more attention to the perceived lack of effort.
Shein’s AI-Generated Plus-Size Model Controversy
In mid-2023, fast-fashion giant Shein faced significant backlash on social media for allegedly using AI-generated images of plus-size models to promote their clothing. Critics pointed out the unrealistic proportions, unnatural poses, and generic facial features of these “models,” which often led to an uncanny valley effect. Customers felt that the brand was disingenuous, avoiding the use of real plus-size individuals and instead relying on artificial representations that didn’t accurately reflect how the clothes would look on diverse body types. This creative choice in their website and social media visuals backfired, sparking accusations of inauthenticity and alienating a key demographic.
Heinz’s “Ketchup AI” Social Media Campaign Fail
While not a direct product image blunder, Heinz launched a social media campaign in 2023 called “Ketchup AI,” asking users to prompt AI to generate images of ketchup. The intention was to show that AI would inevitably create images resembling Heinz ketchup. However, the campaign quickly became a “fail” when users shared AI-generated images that were bizarre, abstract, or even featured other brands, directly contradicting Heinz’s intended message. This demonstrated how relying on user-generated AI content for a brand campaign can lead to unpredictable and off-message visuals that undermine the desired brand association on social media platforms. It showed a lack of control over the creative output when outsourcing to public AI prompts.
Mango’s Unrealistic AI Models Fashion brand Mango encountered customer dissatisfaction and criticism for using AI-generated models in its product imagery. Shoppers pointed out that the AI-generated models often lacked realistic body proportions, making it difficult to judge the actual fit and appearance of the clothes. This raised concerns about authenticity and trust, as customers questioned the reality of both the models and the clothing being sold.
Amazon Sellers’ “I’m Sorry, But I Cannot Fulfill This Request” Product Descriptions While Amazon itself wasn’t the direct culprit, many third-party sellers on the platform faced ridicule when they automated product listings with generative AI without sufficient human oversight. This led to live product pages featuring titles or descriptions like “I’m sorry, but I cannot fulfill this request,” “Sorry, but I cannot create the analysis you are looking for,” or “I’m sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy.” These clear AI error messages appearing directly on product listings showcased a lack of quality control, making the brands appear unprofessional and untrustworthy to potential customers.
The North Face’s AI-Generated Influencer Trip Campaign (Quickly Pulled)
In 2023, The North Face (a prominent outdoor apparel brand with a strong eCommerce presence) launched a campaign in South Korea that quickly drew criticism and was pulled. They used AI to generate images of an “influencer” on a hiking trip, showcasing their gear in various scenic locations. The issue wasn’t just the AI generation itself, but that these trips and experiences depicted were entirely fabricated. For a brand built on authenticity, adventure, and real outdoor experiences, using AI to fake a trip and the associated content was seen as deeply inauthentic. It directly contradicted their brand ethos and was viewed as a lazy and misleading marketing tactic on social media and campaign pages, leading to swift public backlash.
For marketing, branding, customer support, and eCommerce website professionals, the message is clear: generative AI is a powerful tool, but it’s not a magic wand. Resist the urge to dive headfirst into amateurish AI deployment. Invest in genuine expertise, understand the nuances of the technology, and prioritize quality, authenticity, and legal compliance.
It’s OK to experiment, but make sure you’re clear that it is an experiment and the people seeing it understands you’re not taking shortcuts.
Your brand deserves better than to become another cautionary tale in the rapidly evolving world of AI.
0 Comments